The Administrator’s Guide to Federal Programs for English Learners

edCount president Dr. Ellen Forte and a team of edCount associates co-authored this comprehensive manual about serving English learners, released…

Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2011 JoomlaWorks Ltd.

News

News  | 

edCount Conducted Workshop on Applications of an Alignment Evaluation Framework at the Annual Northeastern Educational Research Association (NERA) Conference on October 18-20, 2017

Based on Dr. Ellen Forte’s publications on the topic of alignment evaluation (e.g., 2013, 2017), this workshop provided participants with solid grounding in alignment evaluation methods for standards-based assessments within the contexts of principled-design assessment development, the United States Department of Education’s federal peer review requirements, and the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, & NCME, 2014). Attendees participated in an activity in which they considered an alignment plan and conducted ratings of standards, claims, Performance Level Descriptors (PLDs), task models, blueprints, and items. The workshop concluded with a discussion of communication strategies in terms of reports and questions from stakeholders, including the media, parents, and technical advisory committees. To learn more about the conference, click here

News  | 

Enhanced Assessment Grant (EAG) Award for Strenthening Claims-based Interpretations and Uses of Local and Large-scale Science Assessment Scores (SCILLSS) Project

edCount is collaborating with lead state, Nebraska, and two other states (Montana, and Wyoming) and three partner organizations (ACS Ventures, SRI International, and PIRE, Inc.) on the Strengthening Claims-based Interpretations and Uses of Local and Large–scale Science Assessment Scores (SCILLSS) project, one of two recently funded Enhanced Assessment Grants (EAG). This project will develop a comprehensive assessment approach that clarifies and strengthens the connection between statewide assessments, local assessments, and classroom instruction. Through the SCILLSS project, we are developing tools and resources that focus efforts on restructuring and re-engineering both large-scale and local science assessments to ensure standards alignment, support system coherence, and to yield scores with more meaningful information. This project will have cross-state applicability and generalizability beyond the states engaged in the project. Key facets, including tools and resources, of the state-specific work completed through this project will be adaptable to other states’ contexts and sustainable beyond the life of the project. These tools and resources will be available on the SCILLSS website going live in late Fall, 2017.

Logo for SCILLSS: Strengthening Claims Based Interpretations and Uses of Local and Large-Scale Science Assessment Scores

News  | 

edCount Presented Information on SCILLSS Project at the National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME) Special Conference on September 14, 2017

edCount led a panel discussion on the topic of strengthening claims-based interpretations and uses of local and large-scale science assessment scores at the 2017 NCME Special Conference on Classroom Assessment and Large-Scale Psychometrics. In this panel discussion, SEA and LEA representatives from Nebraska joined a representative from each of the three partner organizations to share insights on how the SCILLSS project activities will engage state and local educators, along with large-scale assessment developers, in creating a shared understanding of science as it is taught and tested. This discussion included descriptions of how principled-design elements for assessment can and should derive from the same conceptual representation of science used to support instructional design and local assessments. Participants learned about the initial stages of the federally-funded SCILLSS project and were encouraged to consider how they can leverage similar approaches in connecting instruction and assessment to support far richer standards-based alignment than is possible with most current large-scale assessment designs.